Skip to Content
  Free Program Still Open!    See more  

 Transforming Education Through Curriculum Innovation 

The National Life Literacy Programme offers a comprehensive suite of free resources, including a "Curriculum Redesign Roadmap," to empower educators and students in New Zealand. 

Explore   Contact Us 

Free national educational program

A group of New Zealand educators and passionate top achieving students working together, aiming to change the future educational accessibility.

Who We Are?

Your Dynamic Snippet will be displayed here... This message is displayed because you did not provide both a filter and a template to use.

Our latest content

Check out our latest events and blogs !

Curriculum Redesign Roadmap

Curriculum Redesign Roadmap

A comprehensive visual guide to transforming educational experiences through structured curriculum design models and modern frameworks

Phase 1: Foundation & Analysis

Establishing the groundwork for curriculum transformation

This initial phase focuses on understanding current needs, establishing objectives, and selecting appropriate foundational models.

Tyler's Model
Objectives-based approach with linear progression
Taba's Model
Grassroots approach with teacher involvement
Goodlad's Model
Values-driven design using multiple data sources

Key Activities: Stakeholder consultations, needs assessment, objective setting, resource inventory

Phase 2: Design & Development

Creating aligned learning experiences and assessments

This phase focuses on designing learning outcomes, activities, and assessments that work in harmony.

Constructive Alignment Framework

A systematic approach ensuring all curriculum components work together toward the intended learning outcomes.

1
Define Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
2
Design Assessment Tasks
3
Plan Learning Activities
4
Select Learning Materials

Additional Tool: SOLO Taxonomy for classifying learning outcomes by complexity

Phase 3: Curriculum Mapping

Creating a visual roadmap to identify gaps and alignments

This phase involves creating a detailed visualization of the curriculum to ensure coherence and progression.

Horizontal Alignment
Ensuring consistency across the same grade or course level
Vertical Alignment
Building logically from one grade level to the next
Interdisciplinary Alignment
Connecting learning across different subject areas

Mapping Process: Diagnose needs → Unpack standards → Inventory materials → Plan pacing → Maintain flexibility

Phase 4: Modern Framework Integration

Preparing students for the age of AI and rapid change

This phase integrates forward-looking educational frameworks that address contemporary needs.

Four-Dimensional (4D) Framework

Modernizing traditional knowledge with essential contemporary dimensions

Skills
Creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, communication
Character
Curiosity, courage, resilience, ethics
Meta-Learning
Metacognition, metaemotion, self-reflection

Key Drivers: Motivation, Identity, Agency, and Purpose

Phase 5: Implementation & Evaluation

Rolling out the curriculum and assessing its impact

This final phase focuses on implementing the redesigned curriculum and establishing evaluation mechanisms.

Wheeler's Model
Cyclical approach for continuous improvement
Kerr's Model
Focus on interrelatedness of components

Implementation Strategies: Phased rollout, professional development, stakeholder communication, resource allocation

Evaluation Methods: Formative assessments, student feedback, learning analytics, continuous improvement cycles

Curriculum Redesign Roadmap | Integrating Traditional Models with Modern Educational Frameworks

© 2023 Educational Design Initiative

Curriculum Design Models for NZ Teachers

Curriculum Design Models for NZ Teachers

A practical guide to implementing sophisticated curriculum design approaches in New Zealand classrooms

Constructive Alignment

Connecting learning outcomes, activities, and assessments

Constructive alignment is a framework for designing teaching that deliberately connects Intended Learning Outcomes, Teaching and Learning Activities, and Assessment Tasks into a cohesive system :cite[1].

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)

Statements that predict what learners will have gained as a result of learning. From the students' perspective, they communicate what they are expected to be able to do and the criteria for assessment :cite[1].

Teaching/Learning Activities

Activities that address the learning verbs in the ILOs, creating an environment likely to bring about the intended outcomes.

Assessment Tasks

Tasks that contain the same verbs as the ILOs, enabling teachers to judge with rubrics how well students' performances meet the criteria :cite[1].

Implementation Framework

Constructive alignment follows four key stages in design:

1
Describe intended learning outcomes using specific verbs, content objects, context, and standards :cite[1].
2
Create a learning environment using teaching activities that address those verbs.
3
Use assessment tasks that contain the same verbs, with rubrics to judge performance.
4
Transform these judgements into standard grading criteria :cite[1].
NZ Curriculum Application

Constructive alignment fits perfectly with the NZ Curriculum's focus on outcomes and key competencies. When designing ILOs, use the achievement objectives from the NZ Curriculum as your foundation. Connect the learning verbs directly to the key competencies - thinking; using language, symbols, and texts; managing self; relating to others; participating and contributing.

Practical Tips for NZ Teachers
Start with existing units: Apply constructive alignment principles to one unit at a time rather than redesigning your entire curriculum at once.
Use Bloom's Taxonomy: This commonly used tool helps create specific, measurable learning outcomes with appropriate verbs :cite[1].
Avoid common pitfalls: Ensure outcomes are specific, measurable, actually assessed, and taught. Limit to 5 main outcomes per course and 3-6 per lecture :cite[1].

Four-Dimensional (4D) Framework

Preparing students for the Age of AI

The Four-Dimensional Framework reflects that today's students must develop in four dimensions to serve themselves and society to the most fulfilling extent possible :cite[2].

Knowledge

The traditional dimension of what students need to know, but modernized to reflect contemporary understandings and the age of AI.

Skills

Creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication - competencies that enable students to apply their knowledge effectively.

Character

Qualities like curiosity, courage, resilience, and ethics that shape how students engage with the world and others.

Meta-Learning

Metacognition (thinking about thinking) and metaemotion (understanding one's emotions) merged into a single competency for adaptability :cite[2].

Implementation Framework

The 4D Framework emphasizes personalization through key drivers:

M
Motivation: Connecting learning to students' intrinsic interests and drives.
I
Identity: Helping students see how learning shapes who they are and want to become.
A
Agency: Empowering students to take ownership of their learning journey.
P
Purpose: Connecting learning to larger goals and meaningful contexts :cite[2].
NZ Curriculum Application

The 4D Framework aligns strongly with the NZ Curriculum's vision of developing "confident, connected, actively involved, lifelong learners." The Skills dimension directly connects to the Key Competencies, while the Character dimension supports the Values and Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. Meta-learning supports the curriculum's emphasis on students becoming "self-motivated, resourceful learners."

Practical Tips for NZ Teachers
Focus on adaptability: In an AI world, emphasize human adaptability - dealing with multiple data sources and modes of reasoning that AI cannot yet master :cite[2].
Collaborate across disciplines: No single teacher needs to cover all competencies - work with colleagues to ensure students get the full complement.
Emphasize what AI cannot do: Focus on imagination in creativity, questioning in critical thinking, and human decision-making intertwined with emotions and social understandings :cite[2].

Authentic Assessment

Connecting learning to real-world contexts

Authentic assessment involves intellectually meaningful tasks that mimic the tasks students will face after graduation, allowing them to demonstrate knowledge, skills, and competencies in realistic contexts :cite[1].

Real-World Relevance

Tasks replicate challenges students might encounter in future employment or community contexts, making learning more meaningful and transferable.

Process Over Product

Focus on justification of choices, weighing of evidence, and the thinking process rather than just the final answer or product :cite[1].

Open-Ended Tasks

Problems without single right answers or clear procedures to follow, requiring students to develop and defend their own approaches.

Implementation Framework

Authentic assessment can range from small tweaks to existing assessments to full redesigns:

1
Case Studies: Use real or realistic scenarios that require application of knowledge and skills.
2
Reflective Activities: Journals, portfolios, critical reviews of experiences.
3
Real Proposals: Grant applications, community problem-solving projects.
4
Role Plays & Presentations: Simulations of real-world situations and communications :cite[1].
NZ Curriculum Application

Authentic assessment aligns with the NZ Curriculum's principle of "Learning to Learn" and the emphasis on preparing students for future participation in society. It supports the Vision by helping students become "actively involved" in their communities and make connections between learning and real-life contexts. Consider how assessments can connect to local iwi, community organizations, or environmental projects relevant to your area.

Practical Tips for NZ Teachers
Start with small changes: Modify existing assessments rather than creating entirely new ones - even small increases in authenticity can have major impact :cite[1].
Connect to local context: Design assessments around local issues, industries, or community needs to increase relevance.
Use clear rubrics: When you have clear learning outcomes and authentic tasks, express them as verbs in your marking rubrics for consistent assessment :cite[1].

Curriculum Design Resource for NZ Teachers | Integrating International Best Practices with Local Context

© 2025 Educational Design Initiative | Created for New Zealand Educators

Evidence-Based Teaching Framework

Evidence-Based Teaching Framework

Research-backed strategies for classroom engagement, literacy instruction, and curriculum implementation

Differentiated Literacy Instruction

Evidence-based approaches for diverse learners

Effective literacy teaching requires understanding diverse learner needs and implementing structured, differentiated approaches that build foundational skills while maintaining engagement :cite[10].

Structured Literacy Components
1
Phonological Awareness - Activities focusing on rhyming, alliteration, segmenting, and blending sounds :cite[8]
2
Phonemic Awareness - Recognizing and manipulating individual sounds in words through playful sound stories and games :cite[8]
3
Phonics Instruction - Systematic introduction of letter-sound relationships using multiple modalities :cite[8]
4
Vocabulary Building - Direct teaching of academic and domain-specific vocabulary in context :cite[8]

Differentiation Strategies for Diverse Learners

Student Need Teaching Strategy Example Activity
Varying Reading Levels Provide different text levels on the same topic :cite[10] Same content at 3-4 reading levels with appropriate scaffolding
Language Proficiency Use visual aids, manipulatives, and technology :cite[10] Picture-word association games, bilingual glossaries
Learning Preferences Offer multiple means of representation :cite[10] Audio recordings, hands-on activities, visual organizers
Assessment Variety Incorporate alternative assessments :cite[10] Projects, presentations, creative responses alongside traditional tests
Literacy Teaching Tips
Use sound walls that feature letters, pictures, and mouth position images to support accurate articulation :cite[8].
Incorporate diverse literature that reflects students' backgrounds and experiences to validate identities and build connections :cite[10].
Implement flexible grouping based on specific needs and abilities rather than fixed groupings :cite[10].

Curriculum Implementation Framework

Applying research to enhance existing curricula

Effective teaching requires both implementing required curriculum content and enhancing it with research-based practices that address specific classroom needs and student characteristics.

NZ Curriculum Context (2025)

Primary schools are now required to implement structured approaches to teaching reading and writing in Years 0 to 3, using updated English and Te Reo Rangatira curriculum content for Years 0 to 6 :cite[5]. The Ministry of Education encourages adjusting assessment and reporting to reflect student progression against these new curriculum expectations :cite[5].

Enhancing Existing Curriculum

Curriculum Element Enhancement Strategy Outcome
Lesson Structure Incorporate brief, explicit instruction followed by guided practice :cite[9] Stronger foundational understanding before independent practice
Assessment Design Use more ungraded or credit-upon-completion assignments :cite[3] Reduced anxiety while maintaining accountability
Content Delivery Present information in multiple formats and modalities :cite[10] Improved accessibility for diverse learning styles
Student Agency Provide choice in activities and assessment methods :cite[6] Increased ownership and motivation in learning
5-Step Curriculum Enhancement Process
1
Analyze existing curriculum for engagement opportunities and potential barriers to learning
2
Select 2-3 research-based strategies to integrate into upcoming units
3
Adapt materials to include multiple representation methods and engagement triggers
4
Implement with consistent monitoring of student response and understanding
5
Reflect and adjust based on student outcomes and engagement levels

Step-by-Step Teaching Framework

Daily implementation guide based on global teaching insights

The OECD's Global Teaching Insights study identifies six domains of teaching quality that support student learning across international contexts :cite[7]. This framework integrates these domains into practical daily teaching practice.

Classroom Management

Structure activities efficiently and minimize lost instructional time through clear routines and procedures :cite[7].

Classroom Talk

Create opportunities for discourse focused on learning objectives, with students explaining their thinking in detail :cite[7].

Cognitive Engagement

Implement tasks that require genuine intellectual effort rather than superficial compliance :cite[7].

Daily Teaching Sequence

Lesson Phase Teacher Actions Student Engagement
Opening (5-7 min) Use introductory hooks, state clear objectives, activate prior knowledge :cite[6] Connect to personal interests, set personal learning goals
Direct Instruction (8-12 min) Brief explicit teaching with think-alouds, varied examples :cite[9] Active listening, questioning, quick processing activities
Guided Practice (10-15 min) Structured collaboration, think-pair-share, scaffolded tasks :cite[3] Explaining reasoning, peer teaching, receiving feedback
Independent Practice (10-15 min) Provide choice, differentiate tasks, circulate for support :cite[10] Applying learning, self-monitoring, utilizing resources
Closure (5 min) Facilitate reflection, preview next steps, collect exit tickets :cite[9] Self-assessment, making connections, asking clarifying questions
Building Responsive Teaching Practices

Research emphasizes the importance of teachers remaining flexible and adjusting lesson plans based on student responses during instruction :cite[7]. The ability to uncover student thinking and guide instruction accordingly is crucial for responsive teaching.

Check for understanding frequently using varied methods beyond "does everyone understand?"
Create a safe environment where students feel comfortable exposing difficulties and taking learning risks :cite[7].
Balance challenge and support to maintain productive struggle without frustration.

Evidence-Based Teaching Framework | Research Synthesis from Stanford Teaching Commons, OECD Global Teaching Insights, and Educational Research

© 2025 Educational Practice Initiative | Created for Professional Educators

A Deep Dive into Innovation and Excellence

Boundless Education. 

Accessible for All. 

Free. Always Free.